BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JEFFREY MICHAEL KENYON <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:42:24 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
Well, I guess it depends on the personalities of the people running and
using the repeater.  The class I took suggests monitoring, but of course
never curchunking the repeater, which is something people do.





On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Andy Baracco wrote:

> When I come on to a repeater, I usually give my call followed by
> "monitoring".  I was once told that you should say "listening" as
> "monitoring" usually refers to the repeater operator.
>
> Andy
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2