Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Sardines
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Aug 1997 11:02:49 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (14 lines)
My apologies.  I didn't know canned sardines were cooked; they
don't *taste* cooked.  In any case, I'm not sure that Muriel is
correct to state that fish oils become "bad" when cooked.  The
studies that appear to demonstrate the benefits of fish in the
diet do not support this.  It might matter *how* the fish are
cooked, though.  Frying seems to oxidize oils more than other
heating methods.  According to Stefansson, the Eskimos boiled
their fish, and I believe the Japanese like theirs steamed.
Boiling and steaming would tend to limit the heat applied better
than frying or roasting.

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV