Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 1 May 2002 08:23:36 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Walt,
I'll take a look at those. I called a contester friend of mine last night
and he recommended a place I have to hunt for on google. I may just stick
with 50 feet since I won't be putting any big antennas on the tower any
more. Thanks for the rohn URL and I'll look at those.
Phil.
Aiming For The Stars
http://www.AimingForTheStars.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: free standing towers
> Phil -
>
> I don't know of too many completely free-standing towers that are over 50
> feet that will carry much of an antenna load, but I have the HDBX-48
(guess
> how tall it is <g>). It was installed in the factory-recommended amount
of
> reinforced concrete and will, the guy who poured the concrete assured me,
> outlast my house by at least a hundred years. You might want to check out
> this URL for information on ROHN towers, recommended antenna square
footage,
> and heights:
>
> http://www.rohnnet.com/CommPro/Towers/BX/BX.htm
>
> They have 48-foot, 56-foot and 64-foot models, but take a look at the
> recommended antenna square footage as the height goes up. DIn other
words,
> know what you plan to put atop the thing before you decide. ROHN is
> notoriously conservative with their load recommendations, but living where
> you do, I personally wouldn't risk overloading any of their towers.
>
> --
> Walt Smith - Raleigh, NC
> [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|