 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:26:25 -0700 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Back in the early '80s I had a Hamarlund HQ 145. It was my first
communications receiver. I remember it had a lot of dials and made
some squawking noises. I didn't know how to fix it and I sold it when
I upgraded to a sony ICF-6700W. Now I have a Kenwood R5000. I sure
appreciate modern technology.On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 08:47:58 -0700, Mike
Freeman wrote:
>You have the 170 and 180 reversed. The latter was general-coverage.
>
>Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
>Amateur Radio: < K 7 U I J >
>
>On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Butch Bussen wrote:
>
>> As I recall the hamarlund models, they were... hq100 general coverage.
>> Its look a like but ham bands, 160 through 6 meters, I have one of these,
>> was the hq110. I think the hq170 was the general coverage of the next
>> model up and the 180 the ham version of this one. I may not remember
>> these right, but sure about the 100 and 110.
>> 73s
>> Butch Bussen
>> wa0vjr
>>
>
|
|
|
