BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Buddy Brannan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:23:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Hi Anthony,

If the A band works as one would expect, that's really OK. (If it did
not, I would understand your worry.) What you're asking for--a subband
that receives as well as the main band, while still being a very broad
receiver, crammed into a tiny package with a much narrower receiver
(thus easier to make sensitive where you want) *and* a
transmitter--is, well, you're wanting a miracle here. Sorry, can't
have it. There has to be a trade-off somewhere. Why do you think it is
that the Radio Shaft HTX-202 handies don't have the overload problems
that plague so many other radios of similar (and smaller) size? Hint:
Check the frequency coverage. So I mean, if you want all the freqs,
you're bound to give up some sensitivity. Especially at such a
reasonable price as the TH-F6A sells at. (Now if you were paying a
price equivalent to a dual-band HT and a *good* shortwave receiver
along the lines of, say, a Sony ICF-2010 or I suppose more
appropriately, the SW-100), you might have a point. Maybe. But while
these circuits are getting smaller and cheaper by the hour, I think
your expectations might be a bit high.
--
Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV/3  | I choose you to take up all of my time.
Email: [log in to unmask] | I choose you because you're funny and kind
                         | I want easy people from now on.
                         | --the Nields

ATOM RSS1 RSS2