I don't really want to jump in this topic, since Bob, Mark, and everyone
else already covered more than enough info.
what I want to say, is just a bit of research result and a last bit info
that seems need to bring out (sorry if someone already posted it, I lost the
track already ;)
AGP is surely the only option for gamer, not only because the advantage of
bus speed, but also 1) there is no up-to-date 3d chip made on PCI form, the
best I could find is ATi 9000 (seems only on sale in Japan) and 2) PCI bus
is share by many devices, but AGP is not shared; by using a PCI card, it has
to share the already very limited bandwidth with any other devices on PCI
bus, AGP card doesn't have this problem.
eg. a common PC today may have the following devices share PCI bandwidth:
sound, modem, NIC, RAID controller, TV capture/video editing
Jun Qian
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gillett" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] PCI vs. AGP
> On 25 Nov 2002, at 12:55, Tom Hazelton wrote:
>
> > This is a question you probably hear a lot. I recently bought a new kit
> > PC and I unwittlingly got a motherboard without an AGP slot. A good
> > graphics card is of significant importance to me ('good' meaning able to
> > handle most current games). Is a PCI card comparable to the AGP
> > equivalent? Or should I return this one and get an AGP compatible
> > motherboard?
Do you want to signoff PCBUILD or just change to
Digest mode - visit our web site:
http://freepctech.com/pcbuild.shtml
|