Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2001 07:31:38 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mr. Sanneh,
Denmark mentioned I want to add that there is a dane who has "invented" a
new method to preserve the beaches along the coastline in Denmark with heavy
erosion. It´s very very interesting and most of all, it´s cheap. The man dig
plastic-pipes into the sand over a certain area of the beach, one end some
feet deep and the other end will stay one-two feet up over the beach. And
within weeks the sea start to "deliver" the sand in that area instead of
taken it out into sea. My english is not good enough to explain the theory
behind this coastal preservation method, but it seems to be effective. Some
places the beach has grown from 10 meters wide up to 50 meters wide within
months.
Maybe you should try and get more information from Denmark on the project.
Regards From Asbjørn Nordam
on 12/08/01 15:47, Sidi Sanneh at [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Mr. Gassama,
> I was rushing to get some sleep when I posted the piece. Thank you for
> pointing out a very vital part of the exercise which I omitted, i.e the
> beach restoration process using sand from external sources. What is meant
> here is that the sand spits and lagoons created at the Mile4-5 and around
> Wadner Beach areas will not be used as a source (which the consultant
> considered as a possible option)."External" is used here to mean sand other
> than these sand spits. No, we are not going to transport sand from the
> Sahara but rather to use a new technology invented for beach nourishment
> and sustainability currently in use in Denmark and Ghana using sand deposit
> from the Ocean floor just at the mouth of the River. The sand d
> eposits
> have been surveyed and the volume quantified. The system works as a
> gradual sand nourishment process, sucking the sand from the Ocean floor and
> depositing it at the pre-determined sites as identified in the zoning
> exercise. The collosal sum is an 'estimate', the actual cost will depend on
> the tendering procedure, implementation etc. and the long time frame of 30
> months may even be an underestimation given our capacity problems in The
> Gambia, but it takes account of the tender, supervision and defect
> liability phases of the project. If the project can be implemented in less
> than 30 months, all the better. Sidi Sanneh
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
> Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
> You may also send subscription requests to
> [log in to unmask]
> if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your
> full name and e-mail address.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L
Web interface at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
You may also send subscription requests to [log in to unmask]
if you have problems accessing the web interface and remember to write your full name and e-mail address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|