Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:36:00 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 24 Jun 1997, Grant Magnuson wrote:
> > a high starch diet probably isn't healthy for most people.
>
> I can see you won't want to join my new list called MCDOUGALL-HEALTH :)
> (http://www.drmcdougall.com/ is worth checking out)
I have this idea that "adequate protein" is a sort of dietary
anchor. If you don't get enough you lose muscle and that's bad.
After that, I see carbs and fats on a see-saw: the more you eat
of one, the less you should eat of the other. The mid-point is
the Zone. I suspect that the Zone is a pretty good average value
to aim for, but individual meals and days should vary according
to specific needs.
Should I write a book? The See-Saw diet? It reduces to two
rules: (1) Eat enough protein. (2) The more fat you eat, the
less carbs you should eat, and vice versa.
Should I announce a cruise?
> Atkins = very low carb + high fat
> Neanderthin = low to medium carb + normal fat (Ray suggests in his book
> that his diet is lower fat)
> McDougall = high carb + very low fat
See what I mean?
> McDougall like Atkins has cruises, tapes, books and probably t-shirts
I need a cruise. T-shirts optional.
> The only thing I'm pretty sure of now is that NeanderThin, between you and
> me, isn't worth the paper it is written on, I'm pissed off with it and I've
> gained 15 pounds -- the more I try to follow it the worse it gets and the
> worse I feel
These sound like good reasons to stop.
> when you check that http://www.drmcdougall.com/ if I recall he has info
> stating that his diet is backed by science and research, you might be
> interested in some of the references if any or given
I seem to recall an announcement that Dr. McDougall was going to
debate Barry Sears sometime soon.
> there is one problem with all us low carbers (all humans I guess too) we
> are bias when we got something fixed in our mind and tend, whether we like
> to and even if we try not to, to avoid contrary evidence
Contrary evidence causes cognitive dissonance, which can be
downright uncomfortable.
Far better to retain a certain *playfulness* about things
dietary, and many other things too.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|