Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 10:57:49 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Organization: |
Hands-on Technolog(eye)s |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Reidy Brown" <[log in to unmask]>
To: "'Beth Skwarecki'" <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: January 04, 2001 10:31 AM
Subject: RE: QUESTION: use of javascript to comply with Sect 508
Sorry, I should have been clearer about the motivation behind this
question.
Someone has asked me to help them with javascripts that comply to
section
508 (for a govt. site, I believe).
I was going to tell them the general WAIS philosophy of "if the page
works
without javascript, you're ok for accessibility"-- then I realized
that this
wasn't actually what section 508 says at all. So then the question is,
"What
does Section 508 require?"
Anyone have any answers?
Reidy
-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Skwarecki [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: QUESTION: use of javascript to comply with Sect 508
> What about [ ... ] client-side validation before
> submitting a form? As far as I can tell, that's not disallowed by
508.
Your server-side validation will provide the same functionality and
"content". You *are* validating your input server-side, right?
> Here's the text:
> (l) When pages utilize scripting languages to display content, or to
create
> interface elements, the information provided by the script shall be
> identified with functional text that can be read by assistive
technology.
^^^^^^^^^^
[identification, not an equivalent?]
That sounds like it would be valid just to have text saying "if you
can't
see this DHTML menu, you're missing a really nice DHTML menu.
Goodbye."
Surely that's not what they mean?!
--beth
--
http://playground.alfred.edu/~bethnewt/
|
|
|