Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 21:04:25 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Content-type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
A very significant part of the model of "built in" access is the idea
of a mass market application for an eyes free interface. With mobile
technology, or an operating system that might be used when the user's
eyes are otherwise involved, you have a need for an eyes-free system.
If mobil technology becomes part of the digital hub for Apple, this
model will make very good sense.
Denis Anson
Jon Gunderson wrote:
>There is the current model as screen reader as an add on (assistive
>technology) in the Microsoft Windows world, but there is also a
different
>model as the screen reader (and other current ATs) as part of the OS
>itself. To the consumer it makes access to computers much more
affordable
>and universal, since they do not need to locate and purchase AT to use
>the OS. I think Apple should be encouraged to use this model since it
>would raise the level of awareness of all users and especially
developers
>to have a screen reader part of their system. The major problem with
this
>is how seriously Apple would take the development of features and
>usability.
>
>Jon
>
--------------------
Denis Anson, MS, OTR
Assistant Professor
College Misericordia
301 Lake St.
Dallas, PA 18612
Phone: 570-674-6413
|
|
|