I was sure that Michael had just made a typo on that.  I didn't bother to
correct it because it did not occur to me that most people would not know he
meant 5400 rpm's.  You are right, it might have been a good thing to correct
because there are no 5600 rpm drives (at least that I know of).



In the subject line would it not be correct to state the RPMs at 5400
rather than 5600.  I find the 5600 rather confusing.

Jim Hills
Houston TX

Carroll Grigsby wrote:
>
> Joel:
>
>
> > > I am writing to ask if 7200rpm drives are significantly shorter
> > > lived than 5600rpm drives or have any other drawback which I
> > > might be overlooking.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance for any info.
> > >
> > > Michael Eisenstadt
>
>

        The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
       tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
           Visit our web site to signup: http://freepctech.com