Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 19 Aug 2001 17:16:16 -0700
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Definition of paleo
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Kimberly Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (106 lines)
Thanks for your reply, Amadeus, and everyone else's explanations, too.  When
I asked the question, I was wondering if Amadeus was a vegetarian who was
either confused about what kind of support group this is, not certain of
what he believes, or trying to convert us  meat-eaters.  But, I don't mind
the spice Amadeus adds to the group.  It's probably good to have at least
one dissenter.

"We have our arts; the ancestors had theirs...We cannot raise obelisks a
hundred feet high in a single piece, but our meridians are more exact."
Voltaire

-----Original Message-----
From: Paleolithic Eating Support List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Amadeus Schmidt
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 10:45 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Definition of paleo


Hi, I've seen yoru posting before I'm leaving off to a Spain vacancy
but I thought I might throw in a few words on your description and
interpretation.

On Sun, 19 Aug 2001 11:19:03 -0400, Richard Geller <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

>Amadeus feels that today's cows, pigs, chickens etc. are industrialized,
>non-paleo versions of what we used to eat.

That's very true, particularly the fat composition is totally different
from any fat one could get in the wild.

>So Amadeus does not eat any meat.

That's true, but not the main reason.
The main reason are my feelings about eating this.
My reasons to be a vegetarian is not what I want to elaborate on - I
consider it off topic and not adequate to discuss amoung a lot of meat
eaters. You may consider it a religious topic if you want.
I hope you can accept this, as some of you did and some seem not to.

>He eats fresh vegetables and fruit and things like yams, amaranth, spelt,
>oats, nuts, etc.

Yes, amoung others, I do include some late paleolithic inventions - bread
cereals (instead of gathered ones). This is neolithicum -a real deviation.
I tried to stay off cereals for a long time - and restrict myself to purist
paleo items (roots vegetables).
Now I feel some whole cereals do me well.

>What makes it interesting is that Amadeus feels that what he eats is a
>paleo diet.
Say, a diet with much power from paleo inspirations.

>A few problems have never been resolved to my satisfaction:
>
>1. sources of omega 3 fatty acids EPA, DHA, and things like CLA etc.. It
>seems hard to get the w3/w6 right eating this way. Too much w6.

EPA and DHA I don't eat - my test showed them to be plenty in my blood.
W-3 I pay a lot of attention, since I love to eat fatty and most fatty
plants have too much w-6 (like industrial animals too, btw).
I eat from hemp and flax both seeds and oil (which both I like).
Flax it *the* historical equal-out of cereal w-6 fat overload.
Maybe the prerequisite that cereal agriculture could emerge and spread.
The reason why native american agriculture (of maize w/o flax) never reached
that level (read Jared Diamond "the third chimpanzee" he doesn't suspect
this, but it matches)

>
>2. sources of certain trace nutrients, esp. B12. Others on this list have
>suggested that vegetarians inevitably eat small amounts of insect and this
>supplies the B12. Could be.

B12 is the weak point of trying to be paleovegetarian.
The b12 levels seem to drop to about 100-150ng and stay there, without
animal products. Probably due to the little b12-production in the ileum.
This is called defficient "by definition" although I didn't experience any
symptoms. I think the high folate enables a lower b12-level.
Or real paleovegetarians ought to eat some termites ;-)

>3. perhaps the biggest objection: this is inevitably a high carb diet. Nuts
>are especially w3 poor. To eat this way, you must eat high carb, low
>protein
>and even low fat; if you eat high fat plant products you are going to have
>completely off w3/w6 ratios.

There are fatty seeds, most of which are poor in w-3, but some are rich in
w-3 (flax, hemp, poppy, pumpkin). I like fatty.

> My point
>is that there are "nearly perfectly paleo" animal protein sources if you
>have the money to pay for them and feel strongly about this point.

I think so.
And I think you *should* feel strongly about this point
*or* equal out unnatural animal fat by (the same as my) vegetable fats.

Really I've learned a lot and got a lot of inspiration from the paleo list.
I've studied archeology for some semesters so I'm interested in the
connection of these both.

regards

Amadeus S.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV