Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:37:20 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
While a USB port may be faster, it is a meaningless fact, in light of the
tiny bit of bandwidth a cable modem requires. Any old ISA 10bps NIC would
work just as well.
Until I started using a router as my NAT, ... I used an old 486 with a just
such NICs as my NAT. I was able download and upload at speeds in excess of
3 megabytes per minute. Personally I would use a NIC and save my USB port
for something else.
Rode
The NOSPIN Group
you wrote:
>I just installed a cable modem, which is great so far. The cable tech who
>came used the USB port, stating that it's faster than using a PCMCIA card
>in my notebook. Was he right? Any differences other than speed?
>When I get a new desktop, he said to use the USB port vs the built-in NIC
>port. Right again?
>Rob
>
>
The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
Visit our web site to signup: http://freepctech.com
|
|
|