Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jan 1998 13:19:20 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.SOL.3.96.980102132837.9801A-100000@polaris> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Todd Moody wrote:
> I agree that pemmican is probably not toxic, although I'm not at
> all sure how edible raw suet is.
Looks good to me. Nothing more than hard white fat, wrapped
around those oh-so-precious kidneys.
The difference between pemmican and sugar is that while both are
concentrated, you will only eat enough pemmican to keep you alive +. With
a milky-way, you eat what it takes to get you full. In addition, you eat
again later as the milkyway high lasts about 30 minuts before you are on
a sugar high. I would hypothise that fat is not addicting, surely not the
way that carbohydrates and alergic reations are.
Anyway, I do like to eat sun-rippened Gizpatcho beens right off
the vine. I heard they were a relitive to the solinoid family, but hey.
I know a raw fooder who eats his gizpatcho soup, well, raw. I went into a
restaurant and they naturally assumed I was a raw-fooder too when I
ordered my own bowl. Darn if I wasn't upset when they brought be a cold
bowl of gizpatcho soup! I demanded to see the manager, and made sure that
I got back a piping hot bowl of gizpatcho soup right away. My raw-fooder
friend couldn't stop giggling for some reason. And whenever I mention it,
he still gets a chuckle. Weird guy, he is.
|
|
|