Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:08:38 EST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 3/22/2001 4:00:42 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> Considering the general mental state of a person developping symtoms. i
> will say that medical intervention at first thru its emotionnal or spiritual
> "hope giving" effect , will postpone the outcome in the physical realm.
> then the hard physical reality of medical intervention take its toll and
> precipate you at the end of the no exit and finish you.
> fondamentally and philosophically, i will say that medical intervention "
> DO NOTHNG" ( Like many human activities ) just playing with the dimensions
> of time and space ( displacing around their relationship).
> A real "'DO NOTHNG ATTITUDE " will be the least stressfull acceptance of
> WHAT Is.
> In other words, : conditions being what they are , necessary outcomes have
> to be experienced .
> If you don't like the outcomes change the conditions.
> The cause of medical intervention is human irresponsibility experienced as
> guilt.
> The experience of guilt 1 ask for a savior 2 expect a punishement .
> with medical intervention you got both and both way between the 2 parties
> ( both sides experience at time the guilt of this unloving relationship and
> project it on the other side )
> Did i succeed at making somebody angry? a doctor? a patient? ( with a smile)
> jean-claude
>
> I agree with jean-claude!
|
|
|