Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:54:17 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ken, From what are you recovering? Sounds awful. I take it from the
vibes I'm getting that we are talking whisky here? Get well soon, Ruth
At 7:08 PM -0400 4/15/01, Ken Follett wrote:
>> Glenfiddich vs. Laphroaig.
>
>Well, having, due to various health issues, had to determine that quality
>is more
>authentic than quantity... moving from a childhood of cheap dinner wine to
>Black
>Label beer to a few years of Thunderbird and a low night many years ago
>with the
>saltiness of cooking Sherry, homemade dandelion & strawberry wine as well as
>various pilsners, ales & stouts (I love fermenting things) and a recent
>bout with
>Wild Turkey, meaning only that I have gone up and down a bit, I can attest
>that I
>prefer most days Glenlivet to Glenfiddich, and having had my turn with a
>bottle
>of Aberlour then Speyburn -- I have to say that so far I much prefer Balvenie
>though can hardly afford it as a staple. If anyone has a spare Laphroaig
>around
>I'll gladly sip it.
>
>][<en (slowly resuming a life not fully reclined or coughing)
--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Westminster, VT
Remember in November
|
|
|