BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"BP - \"Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks.\" -- Mary D" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Leland Torrence <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:41:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"BP - \"Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks.\" -- Mary D" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Hemlock from what I read does not take preservatives well and it is not a
top rated exterior wood.  (There is usually a reason why a material is not
used for the previous two hundred years!)  I have seen Poplar rot very
quickly, on the order of #2 pine.  Regardless of preparations and coatings a
vertical grain mahogany, redwood, cypress or cedar (most species) will last
much longer than pine or poplar.  Now, which is better, old growth pacific
hemlock or brownstone?
It is good to hear all this wood talk.
Best,
Leland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2