Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:42:43 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Organization: |
PRG, Inc. |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And the crowd goes wild with applause!
=========
"Gray, Tom" wrote:
> Sorry, gonna have to inject my two cents worth here! If "someone" wants
> new, go build it in suburbia (or as in-fill at worst)! If it's historic and
> not endangered, better to leave it the F___ alone than to try to make it
> "clean" and totally obliterate the signs of how it got from its origin to
> the present. I personally don't care if its an "A", a "C", or a "P"; the
> damage and loss are all the same. That said, I'm not against maintenance
> and care, I'm just against trying to make something with a history to share
> look too sanitary. Buildings develop patina just like furniture, and that
> needs to be maintained without destroying it.
>
> Tom Gray
|
|
|