BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary Krugman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Hey, this list is not about Nadine - it's about RALPH!
Date:
Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:53:20 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 10/15/2001 8:08:11 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [log in to unmask]
writes:

> If you  post graphics on PigHabit I'll try and tell you if it was
>  likely, or not. Spent greater part of my childhood building stone dams
>  without mortar.

Oooo. An opportunity to get free opinion(s)!!! I just uploaded a couple of
files to PigHabit-L in the folder "Dam" (duh):

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PigHabit-L/files/Dam/

So whaddyathinkwhaddyathink? Some mortar on the embankment walls here and
there. Could be later repairs. Can't get close to the masonry under the
spillway until they divert the water. If no masonry, any speculation about a
concrete core (ca. 1895) even though generally understood to be a simple
earthen dam? (No investigation of the core yet).

M

ATOM RSS1 RSS2