PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hal Trachtenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:42:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> I personally have found that the PIII processes information requests
faster
> than the Celeron.  Heavy duty users will notice the difference in
> performance while others may not.
>
> Steve Beck

It makes sense that the P-III will process faster than a Celeron, the L2
cache of the P-III is 2 or 4 times bigger than the Celeron, (depending on
the MHz of the P-III that you have as some have 256Mb L2 and some use 512),
so calculations are much faster.

              The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
                     support at our newest website:
                          http://freepctech.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2