PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:56:29 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (17 lines)
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, R Bartlett wrote:

> Now, more than ever, we always need to ask ourselves, "who is
> funding this research?"  Its a generally well-recognized truth than you can
> design research to give you whatever conclusion you want before starting the
> research.

So, since all research is paid for by *somebody* with biases, why
pay attention to any of it?  If it's "generally well-recognized"
that you can make research support any conclusion you want, why
does anyone take research seriously, and why does anybody do
research?  Could it be that the researchers are not in on this
generally well-recognized truth?

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2