This story is significant as California is America's largest state and the
two national blindness groups are working cooperatively on a solution from
which all can benefit. The piece of information that stood out in the
article was the comparison between California and Texas. A blind person
in Texas is seven times more likely to get a job than a blind person in
California.
kelly
Sacramento Bee
Special agency for blind sought: Advocacy groups fault Rehabilitation
Department
By Melanie Payne
Bee Staff Writer
(Published Jan. 28, 2001)
It was a historic moment.
One night early this year over wine and Chinese food, members of the
National Federation of the Blind of California and the members of the
California Council of the Blind set aside some 30 years of bickering
to
come together for a cause.
They, along with other advocacy groups for the blind, have formed the
Blindness Alliance for Rehabilitation Change.
The alliance is going up against what they say is a multimillion
dollar
bureaucracy -- the Department of Rehabilitation.
The alliance says the best way to serve the state's estimated 600,000
blind and visually impaired people is to stop lumping them in with
other
disabled people. Instead they recommend establishing a Commission for
the
Blind, an agency specifically designed to meet the needs of the blind.
Alliance members say that about 70 percent of working age blind people
are
out of work despite the booming economy and the estimated $25 million
a
year that the Department of Rehabilitation spends on services for the
blind.
California's unemployment rate now hovers about 3.2 percent.
The Department of Rehabilitation's mission is to assist those with all
types of disabilities in gaining employment and becoming independent.
Critics say, that because the department isn't focused on the needs of
the
blind, it doesn't adequately help the blind.
The 38-year-old department "clearly isn't established for blind
people,"
said Nancy Burns, president of the National Federation of the Blind of
California and former counselor for the Department of Rehabilitation.
"There are special needs and training that a blind person needs to be
independent," Burns said. But the department doesn't understand that,
she
said, and it isn't giving people the skills they need to be able to
work.
Erin Treadwell, a department spokeswoman, said the department had no
position on the commission and declined to comment on it.
The department's director, Catherine Campesi, who moved into the
position
last year, was unavailable to comment because of a busy schedule,
Treadwell said.
Treadwell did, however, elaborate on the changes under way at the
Department of Rehabilitation to address some of the blind community's
concerns.
In the last six months, Treadwell said, the department hired a new
deputy
director of specialized service who will oversee services to the blind
and
deaf.
It is also reinstituting a requirement that counselors for the blind
and
deaf exhibit additional competency in order to serve blind and deaf
clients.
The department, which has been understaffed, has launched a nationwide
search for qualified rehabilitation counselors, Treadwell added.
Critics contend, however, that this is too little, too late.
Nationwide, an estimated 70 percent of blind people of working age are
without jobs, a figure that has remained unchanged despite record low
unemployment levels for the sighted population, according to
statistics
from the National Foundation for the Blind.
In fiscal 1999-2000, the Department of Rehabilitation placed in jobs
roughly 323 people who were blind or visually impaired, including 19
who
were self-employed. Ten people in the Sacramento district got jobs
with
the assistance of the Department of Rehabilitation.
Bryan Bashin, executive director for the Society for the Blind in
Sacramento, is harshly critical of the job the Department of
Rehabilitation is doing to help the blind find jobs.
"California really lags behind," Bashin said. "If you live in Texas
and
you're blind, you have seven times the chance of getting a job than if
you
live in California."
Bashin recognizes that the department has begun to change. Still, he
said,
the system needs "a fundamental, structural rebuilding."
The unemployment rate for the blind and what activists see as the
failure
of the department to adequately address the situation has galvanized
support for a separate Commission for the Blind.
The Department of Rehabilitation has "six layers of bureaucracy"
between
the rehabilitation counselor and the director, said Gil Johnson,
director
of the National Employment Program for the American Foundation for the
Blind.
By its own admission, the Department of Rehabilitation is spending an
estimated $25 million annually on services for the blind. It
successfully
meets the rehabilitation goals for 1,240 of the roughly 4,900 clients
who
use its services each year. Of those 1,240, about 300 are placed in
jobs.
The department's total budget is $444 million. It spends about $316
million on vocational rehabilitation.
According to Johnson, the department has 70 rehabilitation counselors
that
work with blind clients. Half of those counselors provide job
services,
the others work with clients on independent living skills.
That means an average of four to five blind people were placed in
employment by each of the department's 70 counselors last year,
Johnson
said. The national average, he said, is 15.
In addition the average salary of a person placed in a job through the
Department of Rehabilitation is $350 a week.
Oregon illustrates the flexibility of a commission for the blind over
an
all-encompassing Department of Rehabilitation.
The 55-staff member commission for the blind placed 114 blind people
in
jobs last year, with an average weekly salary of $423. The blind
population in Oregon numbers about 70,000 -- about one-tenth
California's
number of blind and severely visually impaired. But the Oregon
Commission
for the Blind placed in jobs one-third as many as were placed by the
Department of Rehabilitation.
Frank Synoground, assistant director of rehabilitation services for
the
Oregon Commission for the Blind and a former California resident, said
that the commission is "more consumer-driven" than a rehabilitation
agency
that serves all disabilities. Four of the seven commission board
members
are blind, he said. The administrator of the agency serves "at the
pleasure of the board," he said, rather than as a political appointee.
Yet, some critics say a small organization wouldn't be practical in a
state like California because it would duplicate $25 million in
administrative services that are already done by the Department of
Rehabilitation.
Even if that's true, commission supporters argue, employed blind
people
would more than make up for the money.
There are more than 100,000 blind people of working age in the state
who
aren't paying taxes and are collecting welfare, disability payments
and
other forms of public assistance, said Bashin said, who estimates
those
programs cost taxpayers $10,000 a year per person.
Dan Kysor, director of governmental affairs for the California Council
of
the Blind, is supporting a bill that would set up a nine-member
commission
-- including at least five blind or visually impaired members -- for
the
blind in California.
He's enlisted the support of state Sen. John Burton, who introduced SB
105, a bill to establish a Commission for the Blind and Visually
Impaired.
Burton said the Department of Rehabilitation "grossly underutilized"
the
services of California's 30 community agencies that serve the blind.
Although Kysor said he expects the majority of legislators to support
the
bill, he expects resistance to come from the governor's office.
A spokesman for the governor had no comment on the commission bill
since
it was submitted only recently and hadn't been reviewed yet.
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
|