On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Don Wiss wrote:

> People will go to great lengths to protect their source of income. Study
> proposals are designed to maximize the chance that they will be funded. And
> researchers want to be respected by their peers. So they aren't going to go
> off and study something their peers disagree with.

So why post research at the paleodiet.com page, for example?  And
why should Ray Audette include a research bibliography in his
book?  What good is research, since all research is paid for, and
all researchers have convictions?

I'm serious.  Why do you think some research "counts" and other
research doesn't?

Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]