PSYCHOAN Archives

Psychoanalysis

PSYCHOAN@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Psychoanalysis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jan 1997 04:20:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I need some professional opinions regarding Masson's assertions in The
Assualt on Truth. First, has anyone refuted the claims/assertions that
Masson has made about Freud's and Breuer's collaborations? Did Anna
Freud ever sue Masson for the things he said about her in the book?
What is the overall impression of Masson as a professional historian
and does he lack credibility in historiographical/academic circles?
 
In short, is Masson considered to be a nut or one with apt claims
regarding the archives, Anna Freud, Breuer & Sigmund Freud, etc?
 
And would you cite Masson in your own work or would you leave him out?
 
sincerely,
 
--
   ----------------------------------------- Carleton University ----------
               Robert G. White               Dept. of Psychology
                                             Ottawa, Ontario. CANADA
   INTERNET ADDRESS ----- [log in to unmask] ------------------- E-MAIL
   ------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2