PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"M.E. Craddock" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:55:05 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 4/7/2001 12:43:40 PM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


>
> This is ghastly news. This just goes to show how cavalier the authorities
> are
> about food. So long as it sells in large quantities and makes big profits
> for
> the food processors, who cares? This must be a result of intensive
> agriculture weakening the strain. And what can we expect with  genetically
> engineered food - no nutritional value at all, perhaps, but it looks good.
> All the more reason to go organic, or better yet, wild foods.
>
>
This is appalling if it is true. What I wonder is...how accurate were the
first nutritional tests that were made on foods....maybe they were not so
accurate the first time around....just hoping. :)
Mary C.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2