Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:25:36 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; |
Organization: |
some |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Written like a true political innocent. Is there a reason to assume that H-Gs were incapable of creating bullshit?
William
27/03/01 2:21:47 AM, Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Phosphor wrote:
>
>> The Savannah bandits should cough
>> up the evidence that paleos actually ate large amounts of grains. No one
>> disputes it could be done, but unlike Amadeus' inwardly spiralling mental
>> universe, wishing it so doesn't mean it happened. More fabled tribes?
>
>Unfortunately, "could have" is often about as good as it gets.
>Where is the evidence that paleos actually ate blueberries,
>cabbage, apples, or any of a hundred other foods that we seem to
>accept as "paleo"? For most of these, "could have" is all we
>have to go on. Furthermore, we have the evidence that when
>paleos finally ceased being paleos and took up agriculture, they
>cultivated grains, not blueberries or bananas. Anyone who says
>they didn't eat grains has to explain why they rather suddenly
>decided to change their whole way of life to raise crops that
>they previously didn't eat at all.
>
>Todd Moody
>[log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|