Tuesday, January 9 10:00 AM SGT

Adam was an Aussie not an African, Australian researchers say
SYDNEY, Jan 9 (AFP) -
Adam and Eve were Australians, not Africans as most experts on human
evolution now believe, according to recently completed Australian research.

The research, soon to be published by an American scientific journal,
presents a new genetic tree showing anatomically modern humanity emerged
from a common ancestor who lived in Australia 60,000 years ago.

A team led by anthropologist Alan Thorne of Canberra's Australian National
University, also shows Australia was once home to a group of Aboriginal
people whose genetic line has vanished from the planet.

The discoveries are based on new analysis of the oldest DNA recovered from
human remains; genetic material from a 60,000-year-old skeleton found near
Lake Mungo in the eastern Australian state of New South Wales in 1974.

Mungo Man, as he has been dubbed, is creating a stir in the scientific
community by casting serious doubt on the Out of Africa model of human
evolution which has been backed by most international experts.

It holds that all living people are descended from a group of homo sapiens
that left Africa around 100,000 to 150,000 years ago.

DNA from a Croatian Neanderthal who lived about 28,000 years ago was
previously the oldest.

Thorne said most primitive forms of DNA known in living humans until now had
been found in sub-Saharan Africa, leading to the theory that mankind
originated in Africa and left it as modern Homo Sapiens before spreading
around the world.

"And so what we have now found is a lineage that is older than any of
those," Thorne told ABC radio.

"It's earlier than the putative most recent common ancestor, the so-called
Eve point in mitochondrial evolution.

"So under a strict out of Africa hypothesise I have to say well they were
wrong, obviously Eve was an Australian."

Thorne also believes modern Aboriginal Australians descended from two groups
of distinctly different people.

"What I have always argued is that there is a distinct difference
anatomically between these two groups of people," he said.

He believes one group entered Australia about 40,000 years before the
others, a new group of "robust" people, who became visible in Australia
about 20,000 years ago and appear to have arrived with edge-ground tools.

"I suspect that these new robust people enter Australia with a new tool kit
and then mix together with other people who are already here to produce the
extraordinary mix of people that we now call Aboriginal Australians," he
said.


Copyright © 2000 AFP. All rights reserved.