Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:03:09 -700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Steve,
there is no particular reason why a flat screen Tv should be more
or less accessible than any other idiot box.
so far I havn't seen a remote with a touch screen on it, that
would be a mess.
As for kiosks with touch screens, if you call the group and want
to actually suggest solutions , you should know that quite a bit
of prototype accessibility work with such systems has been done
by Greg Vanderheiden and his group at trace rehab center at the
univ of wisconsin http://www.trace.wisc.edu
but yes, most installed kiosks and such are not accessible. my
local grocery store, Albertsons, has installed a trial checkout
system with no clerks. It talks but not enough, and requires
reading the display to get through the process.
I wouldn't use it anyhow because I hate all this use of
technology to put people out of work.
tom Fowle
Net-Tamer V 1.13 Beta - Registered
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
|
|
|