On Fri, 22 Sep 2000 07:30:21 +0200, Hans Kylberg <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> >In this list we are discussing "paleodiet" which can be explained as
> >the *natural* diet for humans. Sciences that deal with things that are
> >not natural (if there are any) are of no interest here, they can be
> >misleading. Just my humble opinion.

On Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:27:05 -0700, Ken Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> On the other hand, it is very possible that "paleodiet" can be explained as the
> "designed" diet for humans.
>
> There is significant evidence that when humans deviate from this "designed"
> diet, they encounter heart disease, diabetes, arthritis,  etc. -- just as a car
> develops problems when not fueled with the sort of petroleum products it was
> designed to use, or when an electronics product is not powered with the correct
> voltage and amperage of electricity....


Ken, cars and computers are products that were obviously created by
man,
and you have compared them with humans.  Are you suggesting that you
subscribe to the theory of creationism?

Marylee