Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:51:59 +0200 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Demetri,
You said it yourself... You want to play - get Geforce. You want to
work - get G450. The 2d quality and dual-display support of Matrox is
superior to that of MX.
Yours,
<> Max Timchenko [MaxVT]
<>
<> [log in to unmask]
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Demetri Kolokotronis wrote:
> In deciding between a NVidia GeForce II MX, such as Asus V7100, and
> Matrox Millennium G450, at about the same price, for a new build, I read
> the dual monitor output of the GeForce II MX isn't that great. Can anyone
> comment on that for a GeForce II MX card, particularly compared to the
> Matrox G450? While I recognize the NVidia's superior 3D performance, as I
> am not a gamer, I would put dual display performance ahead of 3D
> performance, if I have to choose.
The NOSPIN Group Promotions is now offering
Mandrake Linux or Red Hat Linux CD sets along
with our NOSPIN Power Linux CD... at a great price!!!
http://freepctech.com/goodies/promotions.shtml
|
|
|