Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Calcium paradox in stone-age diet: high protein yet low calcium intake)
From:
Philip Thrift <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jan 2001 17:25:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Cordain discusses this

  http://www.lifeservices.com/cordain.html  and other places

This seeming paradox (low calcium intake, high protein intake yet strong
dense
bones) may probably be explained by multiple factors. Stone age humans were
more active than modern people and
consequently the everyday work they did resulted in greater bone loading,
which in turn can influence bone density. Further, they
lived outside most of the day so their sunshine exposure and hence vitamin D
status would likely have been superior to most
modern people who work indoors and get little sunshine exposure.

Lastly, and most importantly, the critical dietary factor influencing bone
metabolism and hence osteoporosis is not calcium
intake, nor calcium excretion, but rather calcium balance...


Philip Thrift
http://www.paleofitness.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV