PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Walter W. McKinley" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Apr 1998 04:46:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - PC Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I don't think this is off topic, but if it is, please respond my email.

    We've been through a series of PC's ranging from 386's to Pentium 166's
at work. They always insist on desktop systems instead of towers. My desk
space has always been limited so with each new system, I've stood up
vertically using the vertical desktop bases. We've just received a new
Compaq Pentium II 233 Desktop system. The large bulky slot design of PII CPU
makes me cautious about "standing up" this case. Should I be concerned? My
desk space remains limited but I don't want to damage the system or make it
unstable by ineffective heat dissipation. Any comments or theories would be
appreciated.

Walter McKinley
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2