Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Nov 2000 10:24:27 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:34:53 -0800, Mary <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>If the arguing is off-topic, then the original post on the topic is also
>>off-topic.
>>
>Not exactly, we heard there was going to be included a discussion of dietary
>interventions and the recovery of MMR injured children. Dietary
>intervention, including the omission of casein and grains from the diet, is
>relevant to our list.
I've heard more logical arguments coming out of Florida ! :-)
Clearly, if dietary intervention into X is on topic, then discussion of X is on
topic. Any aspect of X that one knows more about, helps one to know how
dietary intervention would affect X.
--
Cheers,
Ken
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|