CELIAC Archives

Celiac/Coeliac Wheat/Gluten-Free List

CELIAC@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Donald D. Kasarda" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 1995 17:43:46 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
<<Disclaimer:  Verify this information before applying it to your situation.>>

Having been involved personally, I feel that Kellogg Co. did make
rather exceptional efforts in regard to Kenmei. They worked closely
with me as a representative of Phyllis Brogden (Greater Philadelphia)
and other celiac support group chairpersons (who had requested that I
represent them to Kellogg) and the Kellogg's people kept me pretty well
informed. I had ready access at the Vice-Presidential level. My
telephone calls were never turned away. In regard to marketing efforts,
I recall full-page, four-color adds in major magazines and advertising
supplements.  And they put Kenmei on practically every supermarket
shelf in the country.  I think that costs some money.  After all,
Kellogg is not a non-profit organization. If you happen to own shares
(I don't--I haven't any connection whatsoever with the company), or
your mutual fund does, you probably hope the company makes some
profits. In my opinion, there is a limit to what can be expected of a
company competing on the open market with regard to responsiveness to
special problems like celiac disease.  In the ordinary course of
things, they wouldn't think twice about killing a product that wasn't
doing well.  In the case of Kenmei, I would say they did at least think
twice.

Don Kasarda

ATOM RSS1 RSS2