On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:29:19 -0400, Philip Thrift
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 14:58:57 -0400, Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
>>ID is the claim that, given what we know
>>now, it is reasonable to infer design. That's all. Period.
>
>It is more reasonable, given that chemical and
>physical models are sufficient to provide theories for the
>origin of life, then no new *special* principle outside of these
>needs to be added.
Why?
--
Cheers,
Ken
[log in to unmask]