C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:32:46 +0100
Reply-To:
"St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Deri James <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<1B6488747CF8D411801E0000F840E6D1608144@MCDC-ATL-1>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On Sunday 22 April 2001  4:25 am, Barber, Kenneth L. wrote:
> i think what betty is getting at, is that euthanasia will be
> administered to those of us who are disabled just as one who would
> make the desision for a old dog. the dog does not make the
> desision. betty doesn't think we who are disabled would get to make
> the desision.
>
I reckon Joy's hit the button on this one. Euthanesia has far wider
ramifications than just a disability issue. Granted, the person being
"euthanased" is likely to be "disabled" (in some way dependent on the
care of others - otherwise it's Murder One ("Book'em Danno")), but in
the vast majority of cases they have spent most of their lives as
able-bodied.

It is a mistake to term the Nazis slaughter of the disabled as
"Euthanasia", it has far more in common wth Ethnic Cleansing.

I also like Joanne's point that the Disability Issue is more to do
with persuading the medical profession to provide the same level of
care as the non-disabled (go get 'em Mags).


Cheers

Deri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2