My reading on XP is bit different, it says XP will count 3 changes before
you need to call M$ and get another activation code. One sad thing is that
CPU takes 2 count, so if you changed CPU and got more RAM (a simple
upgrade), you will need to call M$. current beta XP activation is easy to
overcome, as long as you have the same RAM size.
But I never personaly played around yet, I just didn't like the idea of how
XP runs, you "have to" run M$ certified software, use certified driver
(otherwise, XP gives you a nice warning) and best of all, M$ has limited 3rd
party software you could run on XP. I will have to deal with XP later, but
not for now.
XP is one step forware of how M$ wants to controll our computer usage.
For me, I stay with win2k, and possible add Linux dual boot later. I see
nothing XP is better than win2k.
Jun Qian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Dana" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PCBUILD] Windows XP - Bad News for Builders
> I have been a beta tester of Whistler now XP both home and pro, have
> rebuild, changed MBs and Video cards three times and almost everything
> else at least one time. With all this going I have used the SAME hard
> drives from the beginning, never has XP had me call in for validating.
> Office XP did when I installed it on a dual boot to ME, but that took
> about a 3 min phone call. A bigger worry for me is this BSA (Business
> Software Alliance), my home city is now one of their target areas. They
> have been sending out form letters every week and have been on all talk
> shows, wanting everyone to come clean or $10,000 plus fines. I am just a
> little home business.
>
Visit our website regularly for FAQs,
articles, how-to's, tech tips and much more
http://freepctech.com
|