Happy New Year Everyone,
Please permit me to give my opinion on the Conduit stuff. First of all, why Conduit and others are crying wolf, wolf around here? For nothing noise! The Conduit complaint leveled against Mr. Peter Munoz and Afonso is a hoax, intended to deflect our attention from important matters that tend to plague our respective community. Please allow me to reasonably defend
my claim here.
On December 29, 2001 Conduit alleged via email that these distinguished gentlemen listed above had intentionally removed his subscription from all the list services of mayor Susan Bauman, terming October 8, 2001 as a day that would live in infamy for such careless action. Mr. Munoz and Mr. Brewoo later clarified that Conduit was never removed as a subscriber and
that the three list services are not owned by the mayor as Conduit claimed. No word(s) from the complainant since then. I'm left with the impression that Conduit's claim is absolutely false. I also find it disturbing and obnoxious that some folks intially cluttered this listserv using alarming term like oppression, and indirectly pointing their proverbial middle
finger at those accused by Conduit. The Conduit December 29, 2001 complaint did not give no reason(s) for such alleged occurence, instead Conduit directed our attention to check out a web site he created for whatever. It would be considered uncivilized if it is Conduit's intention to raise false alarm and tarnish others good reputation in order to win audience over
to his self-created website. As Mr. Richard Yarl's adage would put it " don't raise your reputation by lowering others".
My fellow subscribers, those accused by Conduit are highly respected individuals who have taken sheer energy and time to build their good reputation to higher heights for so many years, and it would take only fools to believe that these individuals have engaged in such irresponsible act. Let it be dismissed from those with the preconceived notion that Munoz and
others are selfish enough to exclude Conduit from this precious medium of communication without valid reason(s) or prior notice. Though I do not know Conduit, but his mode of communication on this issue leaves me to ask: WHAT DOES HE WANT? If Conduit was permanently barred from posting last October then how did I receive his email on December 29, 2001? I appreciate
everyone's concern but branding others to appear like villains is absolutely unacceptable and bizzared. I think it would be wise for us to look at the diversity of any issue before using irrelevant language that tend to create unnecessary tension. Let's look in the mirror and make a change this new year!
Thanks,
Alex Redd
Peter Munoz wrote:
> This issue is indeed most perplexing. Being the target of unfounded accusations is, to say the least, very upsetting; certainly would like to see a prompt resolution to this issue.
>
> To learn if there is a problem with Mr. Harwell's email subscriptions, the following reports were queried Today to compare his subscription options with mine on both the AAM and LUChA Lists.
>
> To my surprised the AAM report indicates that my email address is not included in the AAM Header as owner. The LUChA report indicates that Mr. Harwell's options for both his addresses (subscriptions dated January and July of 2001) and mine are identical. Thus, if my email address is able to post to the List, it follows that his should be able to post as well.
>
> Would suggest the current owners of AAM to send a query command to the Maelstrom Listserv to make a similar comparison.
>
> Respectfully yours,
>
> Peter Munoz
>
> >>> "L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)" <[log in to unmask]> 01/04/02 09:01AM >>>
> > q aam for *info*@*
> You are not the owner of the AAM list.
>
> (note - the request originated from [log in to unmask])
>
> > q aam for *munoz*@*
> You are not the owner of the AAM list.
>
> (note - the request originated from [log in to unmask])
>
> > end
> Remaining commands ignored.
>
> >>> "L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)" <[log in to unmask]> 01/04/02 09:05AM >>>
> > q lucha for *info*@*
> Subscription options for Nathaniel Harwell <[log in to unmask]>, list LUCHA:
>
> MAIL You are sent individual postings as they are received
> SHORTHDR Short mail headers with only "human friendly" fields
> REPRO You receive a copy of your own postings
> NOACK No acknowledgement of successfully processed postings
>
> Subscription date: 31 Jul 2001
>
> One matching entry found.
>
> > q lucha for *munoz*@*
> Subscription options for Peter Munoz <[log in to unmask]>, list LUCHA:
>
> MAIL You are sent individual postings as they are received
> SHORTHDR Short mail headers with only "human friendly" fields
> REPRO You receive a copy of your own postings
> NOACK No acknowledgement of successfully processed postings
>
> Subscription date: 28 Sep 2000
>
> Subscription options for Peter Munoz <[log in to unmask]>, list LUCHA:
>
> MAIL You are sent individual postings as they are received
> SHORTHDR Short mail headers with only "human friendly" fields
> REPRO You receive a copy of your own postings
> NOACK No acknowledgement of successfully processed postings
>
> Subscription date: 9 Jul 1997
>
> 2 matching entries found.
>
> > end
> Remaining commands ignored.
>
> >>> "L-Soft list server at St. John's University (1.8d)" <[log in to unmask]> 01/04/02 09:22AM >>>
> > q lucha for *info*@*
> Subscription options for Nathaniel Harwell <[log in to unmask]>, list LUCHA:
>
> MAIL You are sent individual postings as they are received
> SHORTHDR Short mail headers with only "human friendly" fields
> REPRO You receive a copy of your own postings
> NOACK No acknowledgement of successfully processed postings
>
> Subscription date: 31 Jul 2001
>
> One matching entry found.
>
> > q lucha for *condui*@*
> Subscription options for Nathaniel Harwell <[log in to unmask]>, list LUCHA:
>
> MAIL You are sent individual postings as they are received
> SHORTHDR Short mail headers with only "human friendly" fields
> REPRO You receive a copy of your own postings
> NOACK No acknowledgement of successfully processed postings
>
> Subscription date: 11 Jan 2001
>
> One matching entry found.
>
> > end
> Remaining commands ignored.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, visit:
>
> http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/aam.html
>
> AAM Website: http://www.danenet.wicip.org/aam
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, visit:
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/aam.html
AAM Website: http://www.danenet.wicip.org/aam
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
