PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Jul 2000 00:41:24 -0800
Reply-To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Dave Gillett <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Deep Forest
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On 14 Jul 00, at 16:44, Art Coleman wrote:

> If a dual processor system does indeed have merit, would the
> trade-off be a lack of conventional operation systems, expensive
> hardware, frequent system crashes, etc.

  Generally speaking, the OSes that can take advantage of multiple
CPUs are more stable than those that cannot.
  However:  There are some potential problems in structuring an
*application* to take advantage of multiple CPUs.  Some of these will
only show up if testing is done on a multi-CPU system.  Odds are good
that high-end apps have been tested, and that low-end apps don't try
to use multiple CPUs, but there's a chance of some middle ground of
applications that might have issues with multiple CPUs and may never
have been tested on such a system.

David G

        The NOSPIN Group provides a monthly newsletter with great
       tips, information and ideas: NOSPIN-L, The NOSPIN Magazine
             Visit our web site to signup: http://nospin.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2