PCBUILD Archives

Personal Computer Hardware discussion List

PCBUILD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
PCBUILD - Personal Computer Hardware discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 May 2000 00:11:37 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
David Jonathan Justman wrote:

> I read somewhere that although a fixed-size swap file could help
> significantly on Win95, it hardly helps on Win98, whose memory
> management is more efficient.  Is that true?

win98 has much better memory management, but mainly the improvement was
made in multi-task (pre-empty) mode. use a large fixed swap file can still
increase performance as it does for win95.
Note: win95 is not pre-empty multi-task OS, NT is a true pre-empty, MS says
win98 perform both per-empty and none pre-empty. Pre-empty means when
running multiple programs, each will have their own memory space, so one
grogram down won't affect others.  However, in real lift, nothing is 100%.

Jun Qian

                Curious about the people moderating your
                   messages? Visit our staff web site:
                     http://nospin.com/pc/staff.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2