Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | BP - "Callahan's Preservationeers" |
Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:38:23 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 04/25/2000 2:24:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> He came up
> with a very broad definition of gossip -- something like "unnecessary
> communication of information about another person without their
> knowledge."
Wow. Great commentary. I offer you the yardstick that I follow regarding
gossip:
If I am talking to someone about a mutual acquaintance, would I be willing to
face the subject of the gossip, and say to them what I am saying to the third
party? If I could face a person, and make my comments to their face, then I
don't really consider it gossip. If I couldn't, or would have to make
significant editorial adjustments to my speech, then I qualify it as gossip.
Fortunately or unfortunately, I'm a pretty ballsy broad, and there isn't much
that I wouldn't say to someone, so it may be rationalization, but ... it
works for me.
-Heidi
|
|
|