BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
"Go preserve a yurt, why don'tcha." <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Heidi Harendza <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 12:32:37 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"Go preserve a yurt, why don'tcha." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
In a message dated 12/15/2000 12:52:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Do we dare get into the philosophical quagmire that is
>  the definition of "clean" when it comes to buildings?

Clean is way to vague a term. My mother and I certainly have our
disagreements on what is clean and what isn't. Isn't it said that the Eskimos
have 20 different names for different types of snow? Why can't we develop a
new lexicon for clean?

-Heidi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2