Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:59:41 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Wally Ballou wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 18:36:05 -0400 Todd Moody <[log in to unmask]>
> writes:
>
> > In Phillip's case, some of the protein he is eating may be
> > converted to fat, but he is then using that fat at an even faster
> > rate, so there is a net loss.
>
> Are you sure about that?
No.
> Wouldn't the protein first have to be converted
> to glucose, and then stored as fat?
I don't think so. I have the impression that the protein can be
directly converted to fat, but I'll try to check on it.
> That would seem extremely unlikely
> on a "rabbit starvation" diet of very low fat, and presumably fairly low
> calories.
As he described it before, Phillip's diet was not very low in
calories.
> Under the conditions described, it would seem that the only
> reasonable source of ketones would be from the breakdown of body fat.
Oh, I agree with this for the most part. I was only disagreeing
with Dori's statement that this, the breakdown of body fat, is
the definition of ketosis.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|