Is it so much effort to hit the delete key that one must insult others?
Perhaps you can simply use a filter so that this person's emails never reach
your mailbox if they cause you such aggravation.  Personally, I welcome
everybody contributing their thoughts.  Don't let him turn you off, Keiko.
Dan

Jonathan Julius Dobkin wrote:

> Does this (or any of your other messages) actually mean anything? If
> not, why waste our time? If so, why not write in English (or French,
> Spanish, Portuguese, or something else coherent that I might have at
> least a chance of understanding)?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sueko Sakai <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tuesday, January 9, 2001 8:32 pm
> Subject: Re: [CHOMSKY] is this correct or not?
>
> > On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, Ratibor Trivunac wrote:
> >
> > > > is chomsky really advocating for anarchism? or for the >anarchist?
> > >
> > > For both =:)
> > >
> > > > i'm thinking that he's for the anarchist.  and i'm also saying
> > to myself
> > > > that in every age anarchists are needed, for if not, the king
> > would still
> > > > be in his counting room counting the profits from our parents'
> > "blood &
> > > > sweat."  of course, today it's the capitalist who is in the
> > counting room.
> > >
> > > Chomsky is alllso member of revoloutionary-syndicate called IWW
> > > (www.iww.org) which is advocating for destruction of state and
> > capitalist> system=anarchy...
> > >
> > > > saka'i
> > >
> > > Rata
> >
> > ok, and sorry for responding so late...i had to think a bit on it.
> > so
> > it's about socialism/communism?  my problem is that our social-
> > economicsystem is a big one, and i rather doubt that anarchism is
> > a form of
> > organiation that the mass majority fear--out of ignorance.  but of
> > course,isn't chomsky thinking more along the line of: we begin at
> > the community
> > level, then work our way towards the state.
> >
> > if confucius had the patience to do what needed to be done to recover
> > social order in his time, i guess his way of doing it is a clue
> > for our
> > time? (26 yrs. after his death, confucianism).
> >
> > call me keiko
> > i'm spiritually evolving....
> >