>    First I would question why you want to go back to 95? If your RAM is
> small (16 MB) or processor is slow (486 machine) then maybe you would
> want to go back to 95. But otherwise, 98 is a much superior OS for PCs
> that can handle it.

        Actually I would have to disagree on this, by far the most stable version
of win9x has been win95B (or C they are almost the same), at least for me.
Unless you need USB (or any of the other features that win98 offers) I
recommend to most people that they stick with win95B. Win98 is just too
bloated, alot of stuff is in it that people never use (heck alot of stuff is
in win95 that people rarely use too). Just my opinion, but I am sticking
with win95B, well, and Linux! :) TTYL

         The NOSPIN Group Promotions is now offering the NOSPIN
        File Download CD... All the files from our File Download
         area and much more...  over 165 files, all on one CD!!
                      http://nospin.com/promotions