Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 7 Aug 2000 08:56:39 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Okay, I've missed a post or two.... Was there a url pointing to this
research? Would be ecstatic for anyone to reiterate this.... Thanks, :)
Oliva
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wally Day"
> > Subject: Re: SFAs and EFAs
> >
> > On Sat, 5 Aug 2000 07:55:22 -0400, Todd Moody
> > <[log in to unmask]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [very nice research]
> > >This supports the dietary
> > >principle that fat and carbohydrate intake should
> > be inversely
> > >proportional to each other. If this principle is
> > adhered to, I
> > >doubt that SFAs present a problem.
> >
> > Bingo -- thanks for the research you did supporting
> > this
> > principle.
>
> Which also supports the idea that some folks do better
> on higher carb/lower fat diets, and some folks do
> better on higher fat/lower carb diets. (So long as
> protein remains "reasonably" high - IMO). I suspect
> that some folks will actually do better ehwn they
> "cycle" these two modes of dieting.
>
> > Dave,
> >
> > You win.
> >
> > Enjoy,
> > Kirt
>
> WOW!
>
|
|
|