Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2000 16:25:10 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well then alexs I take it that you think all commercial store-bought eggs
are bad news, whether they be fortified with Omega 3 or otherwise. Any eggs
that aren't laid by free-roaming range-fed hens or by wild cave-birds of
40,000 BC are unnatural and dubious and non-paleo and they may even make
breast milk poisonous to our babies.
Perhaps I'll heed your warning and go back to a safer and healthier
breakfast of jelly donuts and coffee. :-)
-gts
From: "alexs" <[log in to unmask]>
> Oh, sure, like some paleo-era hen is going to be eating this kind of diet?
> I don't think so. IMO a non-paleo-fed animal has a very dubious place
> in the diet of a human paleo aspirant. And yes I believe it goes as far
> down the food chain as one cares to consider.
>
> Does "healthy grains" (an oxymoron in paleohuman dietary terms) include
> GM corn and soy? In N. America one can bet it does! And don't get
> me started on "canola", aka intensely-refined, erucic acid-contaminated,
> GM rapeseed oil. Bran from one of the most environmentally-damaging
> crops in human history? Kelp? Get real! And tocopherols from soyabeans?
> Not paleo, nuh uh.
>
> These hens are fed what must be the most unnatural diet ever. Add to
> that the legal but inhumane confinement under which they are raised
> (no I'm not a PETA stooge) and one can naturally conclude that there
> ain't nuttin natural about Eggland's product, patented or not.
>
|
|
|