Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 07:30:56 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> Levine said there were many studies showing the superiority of
>> breast milk for infants and that the goal has been to fortify formula
>"so that
>> it is like breast milk."
>
>Ardeith writes:
>Most of the mothers I know breast-fed their babies.....
>Most women can successfully breastfeed if they
>wish......I'd really love to see the companies that
>make baby formula put out of business by more
>and more women choosing to nurse their babies.....
>but the aim seems to be to convince women that
>formulas are as good for their babies as breastmilk.
>Formulas are a blessing for those few women who
>cannot breastfeed for one reason or another......
>but formulas will never be as perfect for an infant
>as the infant's own mother's milk.......I hope.......
Forget the nutritional aspect for a moment, and
consider what the very existence of formula allows
to happen: institutionalized infant abandonment
(i.e "daycare"), destruction of the fundamental
mother-infant bond, loss of proper dental/jaw
development, and other subtle dysfunctions.
>
>>
>> More research on DHA and AA are appropriate, said Levine, but use of
>> the two fatty acids in baby formula "is very, very promising."
>>
>Ardeith writes:
>From where are they obtaining the two fatty acids they
>are bragging about? From plant fats? From animal
>fats? Does anyone know?
Again, the only thing that is very, very promising
is the bright future for imitation infant food
manufacturers, and the industries of abandonment,
dental mutilation and psychological repair
dependent thereon.
Breastfeeding is the only proper way to feed an infant,
is 100% Paleo both in WOE and WOL. Those who would offer
"alternatives" -- replacements/displacements -- have
an axe to grind and stand to profit thereby.
|
|
|