I'm having an email conversation with a strict vegetarian, and he's raised the old argument that our intestinal length in relation to body weight is more similar to herbivores than to carnivores. I remember reading this first in "Fit For Life" a long time ago, then later reading a rebuttal that pointed out that we actually are more similar to other omnivores anatomically - but I've forgotten the rationale used. It seems you can use intestine length versus body weight, trunk length, intestine/colon length, and prove just about anything you want. I know Ray talks about gut ratio (large/small intestine). Does anyone have any more input about that intestine length/body weight argument? Sam