One suggestion I heard is double aught. Which reminded me I aught to be doin fomething other than meffing with trivial e-mail, only morefo than before. George Kramer wrote: > At 12:38 PM 10/11/98 EDT, John wrote: > > > >By the way, I just scheduled a workshop in naught 1. (I ought to know the > >correct spelling, but I probably don't) > > > Ought this not be "aught," as in aught 1 (aught according to Webster's 10th > means nothing or "zero"...."naught" mean nothing or not.).... > > Ah, I just love it when preservation turns to semantics....:) > > George Kramer, M.S. > Historic Preservation Consultant > Ashland, Oregon -- ][<en Follett SOS Gab & Eti -- http://www.geocities.com/~orgrease Bullamanka-Pinheads website http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/CGI/wa.exe?A0=bullamanka-pinheads